Margot B World News
 
Updated 30 June 2005'''''Feedback ' Chat Rooms' 'Political Crossfire' Forum
*Search
*Finds any story linked on Margot B World News
Translate this Web Page to:

We need your help to offset the costs associated with site hosting & bandwidth usage. We try not to whine too loudly but if you find this site informative please help by clicking here
any amount helps, from $1 on up Donate by mail - it's fast, easy & secure
Articles by Margot B
Commentaries
Contributors
Fashion Page
Flowers of Galilee, Israel Shamir
Gossip & Entertainment Hot Links
Jokes
Links
MargotB War Blog
Medical News
Mirror Site
News Sources
RecentArchives
Shop at Margot B Online Store
Shop at Larryb Photography
Technology
Margot's Writers' Forum
Newspapers & Magazines

 

 
 
Contact: Claire Bowles
claire.bowles@rbi.co.uk
44-207-611-1210
New Scientist

Are we on our way back to the Dark Ages?

SURFING the web and making free internet phone calls on your Wi-Fi laptop, listening to your iPod on the way home, it often seems that, technologically speaking, we are enjoying a golden age. Human inventiveness is so finely honed, and the globalised technology industries so productive, that there appears to be an invention to cater for every modern whim.

But according to a new analysis, this view couldn't be more wrong: far from being in technological nirvana, we are fast approaching a new dark age. That, at least, is the conclusion of Jonathan Huebner, a physicist working at the Pentagon's Naval Air Warfare Center in China Lake, California. He says the rate of technological innovation reached a peak a century ago and has been declining ever since. And like the lookout on the Titanic who spotted the fateful iceberg, Huebner sees the end of innovation looming dead ahead. His study will be published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

It's an unfashionable view. Most futurologists say technology is developing at exponential rates. Moore's law, for example, foresaw chip densities (for which read speed and memory capacity) doubling every 18 months. And the chip makers have lived up to its predictions. Building on this, the less well-known Kurzweil's law says that these faster, smarter chips are leading to even faster growth in the power of computers. Developments in genome sequencing and nanoscale machinery are racing ahead too, and internet connectivity and telecommunications bandwith are growing even faster than computer power, catalysing still further waves of innovation.

But Huebner is confident of his facts. He has long been struck by the fact that promised advances were not appearing as quickly as predicted. "I wondered if there was a reason for this," he says. "Perhaps there is a limit to what technology can achieve."

In an effort to find out, he plotted major innovations and scientific advances over time compared to world population, using the 7200 key innovations listed in a recently published book, The History of Science and Technology (Houghton Mifflin, 2004). The results surprised him.

Rather than growing exponentially, or even keeping pace with population growth, they peaked in 1873 and have been declining ever since (see Graphs). Next, he examined the number of patents granted in the US from 1790 to the present. When he plotted the number of US patents granted per decade divided by the country's population, he found the graph peaked in 1915.

The period between 1873 and 1915 was certainly an innovative one. For instance, it included the major patent-producing years of America's greatest inventor, Thomas Edison (1847-1931). Edison patented more than 1000 inventions, including the incandescent bulb, electricity generation and distribution grids, movie cameras and the phonograph.

###

Written by ROBERT ADLER, a freelance science writer based in California.

IF REPORTING ON THIS STORY, PLEASE MENTION NEW SCIENTIST AS THE SOURCE AND, IF PUBLISHING ONLINE, PLEASE CARRY A HYPERLINK TO: http://www.newscientist.com

"This article is posted on this site to give advance access to other authorised media who may wish to quote extracts as part of fair dealing with this copyrighted material. Full attribution is required, and if publishing online a link to www.newscientist.com is also required. The story below is the EXACT text used in New Scientist, therefore advance permission is required before any and every reproduction of each article in full. Please contact celia.thomas@rbi.co.uk. Please note that all material is copyright of Reed Business Information Limited and we reserve the right to take such action as we consider appropriate to protect such copyright."

THIS IS PART OF A NEWS ARTICLE THAT APPEARS IN NEW SCIENTIST MAGAZINE ISSUE:
2 JULY 2005. IF YOU WISH TO READ THE FULL STORY, PLEASE CONTACT CLAIRE BOWLES

UK CONTACT - Claire Bowles, New Scientist Press Office, London:
Tel: 44-207-611-1210 or email claire.bowles@rbi.co.uk

US CONTACT – New Scientist Boston office:
Tel: 1-617-558-4939 or email kyre.austin@reedbusiness.com

GO BACK HOME
Copyright © Margotsweb™ Design Contact Us
Opinions expressed in news articles on this Web site are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of margotbworldnews.com,
its editors, publishing staff, or officers.